{"id":1741,"date":"2018-04-02T20:07:30","date_gmt":"2018-04-02T20:07:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.jacksonwhitelaw.com\/az-labor-employment-law\/?page_id=1741"},"modified":"2024-11-21T23:23:47","modified_gmt":"2024-11-21T23:23:47","slug":"what-is-qui-tam-lawsuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jacksonwhitelaw.com\/az-labor-employment-law\/blog\/what-is-qui-tam-lawsuit\/","title":{"rendered":"What is a Qui tam Lawsuit?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Introduction<\/h2>\n

\u201cQui tam\u201d is short for the Latin phrase, \u201cqui tam pro domino rege quam pro se ipso in hac parte sequitur.\u201d For those of us who don\u2019t speak Latin, that roughly translates to \u201che who brings an action for the king as well as for himself.\u201d Following that principle, a qui tam lawsuit is a civil suit filed by whistleblowers on behalf of the United States Government against an individual or company who has defrauded the government. The purpose of the lawsuit is to seek damages for the government losses, and the whistleblower who files the initial qui tam lawsuit is entitled to a portion of the final settlement or court judgement.<\/p>\n

The False Claims Act<\/h2>\n

The False Claims Act (FCA<\/a>) is the federal law that provides the legal basis for qui tam lawsuits. Under the FCA, whistleblowers are able to file a federal complaint \u201cunder seal\u201d that offers a detailed explanation of how the individual or company in question has defrauded the government. The defendant will not be served notice of the complaint. As long as the case remains under seal, only the whistleblower\u2019s attorneys, the court, and federal authorities will be privy to the case.<\/p>\n

After the initial complaint is filed, the US Department of Justice<\/a> will review the case and determine whether or not to \u201cintervene.\u201d If the DOJ chooses to intervene (which it does in about one-third of qui tam cases), they will completely take over the case. If the DOJ declines to intervene, the whistleblower has the right to pursue the case on their own. The latter route will require significantly more work from the whistleblower\u2019s attorneys, but if the case is successful the whistleblower will be entitled to a larger portion of the settlement or court judgement.<\/p>\n

Examples of Government Fraud<\/h2>\n

The majority of qui tam lawsuits involve Medicare, Medicaid, defense contractors, the financial industry, and federal grant programs. Some of the more common examples include:<\/p>\n