It is traumatic enough when a student suffers a situation, such as sexual assault, that causes them to file a claim against their school. Even more unfortunate is when their claim causes retaliation from other students or school employees. Such was the case in a 2006 sexual assault incident in Pennsylvania.

Despite the efforts of many, our nation is still affected by discrimination. While that is a sad fact that you or I may not be able to control, we should be able to send our children to school with the faith that they won’t be targeted because of their race, color, or national origin. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 mandates, “no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination” in the context of academic programs, counseling and guidance, grading, classroom assignments, physical education, or athletics.

In 2005, a sophomore at Hunters Lane High School in Nashville, Tennessee rode the bus home from school and was assaulted by two other students, leaving him with serious physical injuries. The victim, Brandon Wilson, and his parents sued for damages.

As a parent, you should never have to worry about your child’s safety when you drop them off at school in the morning. You should have the right to assume that the people hired to teach your children will always have their best interests in mind. Unfortunately, there are hundreds of teachers working in the United States that use their authority to prey on vulnerable students. Alarmingly, in a 2004 survey, it was reported that 10% of US public school students have felt sexually targeted by a school employee. Sexual assault, abuse, and sexual harassment claims against teachers is said to be 100 times greater than those against Catholic priests, according to several sources.

Hearing stories of sexual abuse in day cares can be upsetting to anyone, but most especially to parents with young children. As a parent, when you enroll a child in a day care facility, you should feel comforted and assured that your child will be kept free from physical and emotional harm. It’s a travesty when a day care fails to uphold their promise to keep your child safe.

While it may not be unheard of for children to touch each other inappropriately without bad intentions, it’s when things go too far that parents should rightfully be concerned. On a parenting web forum on city-data.com, a mother posted her concern after her child was involved in an inappropriate touching incident while at daycare.

The U.S. Department of Justice in a report dated December 15, 2011 stated that the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) use of excessive force may constitute a pattern or practice of Fourth Amendment violations under Section 14141. Example:

• In May 2009, an MCSO deputy stopped E.E., a Latino U.S. citizen, after E.E. picked up a Latino day laborer. The deputy told E.E. that he had pulled him over for speeding, but E.E. suspected that he had been pulled over because of his and his passenger’s Latino ethnicity. E.E. questioned the deputy’s reason for pulling him over. The deputy, along with other MCSO deputies who had arrived on the scene, responded by forcibly removing E.E. from his vehicle, twisting his arm, head, and neck and causing E.E. to fall and hit his face on the pavement. The MCSO deputies kept E.E. on the ground, handcuffed him, and searched him. E.E. was bleeding from multiple lacerations to his face, and experienced neck and back pain from the holds the MCSO deputies had used to remove him from his vehicle. E.E. was ultimately taken to a medical facility where he received treatment for injuries to his face, neck, shoulder, and back. E.E. was never charged with any offense that might explain the officers’ use of force. Instead, E.E. was charged with criminal speeding and failure to produce identification. Both of these charges were eventually dropped.

Latinos vs MCSO

The U.S. Department of Justice found that the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office has engaged in discriminatory policing practices against Latinos, as follows:

1. Latino drivers are likely to be stopped by MCSO officers four to nine times more often on Maricopa County roads than similarly situated non-Latino drivers; and

2. A study of traffic-related incident reports generated by MCSO’s Human Smuggling Unite (HSU) over a three-year period showed that roughly one-fifth of the reports, almost all of which involved Latino drivers, contained information indicating that the stops were conducted in violation of the 4th Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable seizure.

The U.S. Department of Justice has found reasonable cause to believe that the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) engaged in a pattern of unconstitutional policing.

On December 15, 2011, The U.S. Department of Justice charged that the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office’s immigration enforcement practices are unconstitutional and are harming innocent Latinos. If you are Latino and have been detained or otherwise mistreated by law enforcement officers in the past two years, or you are a Latino minor under the age of 18 and have been detained or otherwise mistreated by law enforcement officers, you may have a claim for damages.

Do you need an attorney
on your side?

Level the playing field by letting me
fight your injury case for you!
Don't get taken advantage of.


I don't get one dollar until you are compensated.

480-648-8928

We will only use this contact information for a one-time consultation unless you request otherwise. Read our privacy policy.